1. Andersen, B. (2012). What web ads, blurbs and introductions tell potential dictionary buyers about users, user needs and lexicographic functions. Journal of Language and Communication in Business, 49, 119-149.
2. Ansari, H., & Babaii, E. (2005). The generic integrity of newspaper editorials: A systemic functional perspective, RELC Journal, 36 (3), 271-295.
3. Askehave, I. (2007). The impact of marketization on higher education genres-the international student prospectus as a case in point. Discourse Studies, 9(6), 723-742.
4. Barnett, R. ( 2011). The marketized university: defending the indefensible. In M. Molesworth, R. Scullion, & E. Nixon (Eds.), The Marketisation of Higher Education and the Student as Consumer (pp.39-51). New York: Routledge.
5. Basturkmen, H. (2009). Back Cover Blurbs: Puff Pieces and Windows on Cultural Values. In K. Hyland & G. Diani (Eds.). Academic Evaluation Review Genres in University Settings (pp.68-83). England: Palgrave MacMillan.
6. Bhatia, V.K. (2004). Worlds of Written Discourse. London: Continuum.
7. Bhatia, V.K. (2005). Generic patterns in promotional discourse. In H. Halmari & T. Virtanen (Eds.), Persuasion Across Genres (pp. 213-229). Philadelphia : John Benjamins.
8. Briggs, C.L. & Bauman, R. (1992). “Genre, intertextuality, and social power”. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 2 (2), 131-172.
9. Constantinides, E. & Stagno, M.C.Z. (2011). Potential of the social media as instruments of higher education marketing: a segmentation study. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 21(1), 7-24.
10. Coulter, X. & Mandell, A. (2012). Adult Higher Education: Are We Moving in the Wrong Direction?, The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 60(1), 40-42.
11. Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse and Society, 4(2), 133-168.
12. Flowerdew, J., & Li, Y. (2009) The Globalisation of Scholarship: Studying Chinese Scholars Writing for International Publication. In R. Manchon (Ed.), Writing in Foreign Language Contexts Learning, Teaching and Research (pp.156-182). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
13. Gea-Valor, M. L. (2005). Advertising books: A linguistic analysis of blurbs, Ibérica, 10, 41–62.
14. Halmari, H. & Virtanen, T. (2005). Towards understanding modern persuasion. In H. Halmari & T. Virtanen (Eds.), Persuasion Across Genres (pp. 229-245). Philadelphia : John Benjamins.
15. Han, Z. (2014). The marketization of public discourse: The Chinese universities. Discourse & Communication, 8 (1), 85-103.
16. Hemsley-Brown, J. (2011). Market heal thyself: the challenges of a free market in higher Education. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 21(2), 115-132.
17. Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2009). ‘The leading journal in its field’: evaluation in journal descriptions. Discourse Studies, 11(6), 703-720.
18. Jarvis, P. (2007). Globalization, Life-long Learning, and the Learning Society. Routledge: Taylor& Francis.
19. Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for specific purposes, 24, 269 - 292.
20. Li, L.J. ,& Ge, G.C. (2009). Genre analysis: Structural and linguistic evolution of the English-medium medical research article (1985-2004). English for Specific Purposes, 28(2), 93-104.
21. Martin, P., & Perez, I.K.L. (2014). Convincing peers of the value of one’s research: A genre analysis of rhetorical promotion in academic texts. English for Specific Purposes, 34(1), 1-13.
22. Mautner, G. (2005). The entrepreneurial university: A discursive profile of higher education buzzwords. Critical Discourse Studies, 2(2), 95–120.
23. Newman, S., & Jahdi, K.H. (2009). Marketization of education: marketing, rhetoric, and reality. Journal of Further & Higher Education, 33(1), 1-11.
24. Onder, N. (2013). Generic structure and promotional elements in best-selling online book blurbs: A cross-cultural study. Ibérica, 25, 171-194
25. Osman, H. (2008), Re-branding academic institutions with corporate advertising: a genre perspective. Discourse & Communication, 2(1), 57-77.
26. Ostman, J.O. (2005). Persuasion as implicit anchoring: The case of collocations. In H. Halmari & T. Virtanen (Eds.), Persuasion Across Genres (pp. 183-213). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
27. Pampaloni, A.M. (2010). The influence of organizational image on college selection: What students seek in institutions of higher education. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 20(1), 19-48.
28. Salager-Meyer, F. (1999). Referential behavior in scientific writing: A diachronic study (1810– 1995). English for Specific Purposes, 8(3), 279–305.
29. Santoro, N., & Snead, S.L. (2013). “I am not a real academic”: A career from industry to academia. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 37(3), 384-396.
30. Swales, J. M. (2004). The manuscript version of chapter seven of Research genres:Explorations and application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Swales, J.M., & Rodgers, P.S.(1995). Discourse and the projection of corporate culture: The mission statement. Discourse& Society, 6(2), 223- 242.
32. Tse, P., & Hyland, k. (2009). Discipline and Gender: Constructing Rhetorical Identity in Book Reviews. In K. Hyland & G. Diani (Eds.). Academic Evaluation Review Genres in University Settings (pp.105-121). England: Palgrave MacMillan.
33. Woodall, T. Hiller, A., & Resnick, S. (2014). Making sense of higher education: students as consumers and the value of the university experience. Studies in Higher Education, 39(1), 48-67.
34. Xiong, T.(2012). Discourse and marketization of higher education in China: The genre of advertisements for academic posts. Discourse & Society, 23(3), 318-337.