[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 21, Issue 2 (9-2018) ::
IJAL 2018, 21(2): 195-230 Back to browse issues page
A Young EFL Learner’s Lexical Development through Different Input and Output Frequency Patterns
Muhamad Alii Rahimi, Javad Gholami , Zhila Mohammadnia
Abstract:   (6803 Views)
The present study was undertaken to investigate the effects of varying frequency patterns (FPs) of words on the productive acquisition of a young EFL learner in a home setting. Target words were presented to the learner using games and role plays. They were subsequently traced for their frequencies in input and output. Eighteen immediate tests and delayed tests were administered to measure the oral production following the treatments. To examine the efficacy of varying FPs, target words were grouped into four sets: High Input/High Output (HIHO), Low Input/Low Output (LILO), High Input/Low Output (HILO), and Low Input/High Output (LIHO). The findings revealed that the differences among the FPs were statistically significant. Meanwhile, Wilcoxon signed-rank test identified a significant discrepancy between the words with LILO and HIHO frequency patterns. The findings demonstrated that the differences in FPs led to different productive gains, and higher word production cropped up when words occurred very frequently both in input and output. This study shows that higher teacher talk in tandem with higher learner talk could boost lexical production by a young learner in meaning-focused instructions.
Keywords: EFL child learner, Frequency, Input, Output, Lexical development
Full-Text [PDF 673 kb]   (1091 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2018/06/2 | Accepted: 2018/07/25 | Published: 2018/08/10
References
1. Bargh, J. A., & Pietromonaeo, P. (1982). Automatic information processing and social perception: The influence of trait information presented outside of conscious awareness on impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 437-449. [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.43.3.437]
2. Barrett, M., Harris, M., & Chasin, J. (1991). Early lexical development and maternal speech: a comparison of children's initial and subsequent use of words. Journal of Child Language, 18(1), 21-40. [DOI:10.1017/S0305000900013271]
3. Blom, E., Paradis, J., & Duncan, T. S. (2012). Effects of input properties, vocabulary size, and L1 on the development of third person singular-s in child L2. English Language Learning, 62, 965-994. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00715.x]
4. Bohman, T. M., Bedore, L. M., Peña, E. D., Mendez-Perez, A., & Gillam, R. B. (2010). What you hear and what you say: Language performance in early sequential Spanish-English bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13, 325-344. [DOI:10.1080/13670050903342019]
5. Brent, M. R., & Siskind, J. M. (2001). The role of exposure to isolated words in early vocabulary development. Cognition, 81(2), B33-B44. [DOI:10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00122-6]
6. Butler, Y. G. (2009). How do teachers observe and evaluate elementary school students' foreign language performance? A case study from South Korea. TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 417-444. [DOI:10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00243.x]
7. Bybee, J. (2010). Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511750526]
8. Carey, S., & Bartlett, E. (1978). Acquiring a single new word. Proceedings of the Stanford Child Language Conference, 15, 17-29.
9. Chen, C., & Truscott, J. (2010). The effects of repetition and L1 lexicalization on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 31(5), 693-713. [DOI:10.1093/applin/amq031]
10. Crossley, S. A., Salsbury, T., Titak, A., & McNamara, D. S. (2014). Frequency effects and second language lexical acquisition: Word types, word tokens, and word production. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 19(3), 301-332. [DOI:10.1075/ijcl.19.3.01cro]
11. Curtain, H. & Dahlberg, C. (2010). Languages and children: Making the match (4th Ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
12. de Bot, K. (1996). Review article: The psycholinguistics of the output hypothesis. Language Learning, 46(3), 529-55. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01246.x]
13. de la Fuente, M. (2002). Negotiation and oral acquisition of L2 vocabulary. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 81-112. [DOI:10.1017/S0272263102001043]
14. Ellis, N. C. (2005). At the interface: dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 305-352. [DOI:10.1017/S027226310505014X]
15. Ellis, N. (2007). The Associative-Cognitive CREED. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp.77-95). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Ellis, N. (2012). What can we count in language, and what counts in language acquisition, cognition, and use?. In S.T. Gries & D. S. Divjak (Eds.), Frequency effects in language learning and processing (pp. 7-34). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
17. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Ellis, R., & He, X. (1999). The roles of modified of input and output in the incidental acquisition of word meanings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 280-301. [DOI:10.1017/S0272263199002077]
20. Enever, J., & Moon, J. (2009). New global contexts for teaching primary ELT: Change and challenge. In J. Enever, J. Moon & U. Raman (Eds.), Young learner English language policy and implementation: International perspectives (pp. 5-21). Reading: Garnet Education.
21. Erlam, R. (2003). Evaluating the relative effectiveness of structured-input and output-based instruction in foreign language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 59- 582. [DOI:10.1017/S027226310300024X]
22. Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Elrbaum.
23. Gathercole, V. C. M. (2002a). Command of the mass/count distinction in bilingual and monolingual children: An English morphosyntactic distinction. In D. K. Oller & R. E. Eilers (Eds.), Language and literacy in bilingual children (pp. 175-219). Clevedon, U.K: Multilingual Matters. [DOI:10.21832/9781853595721-009]
24. Genesee, F. (1987). Learning through two languages: studies of immersion and bilingual education. Cambridge MA: Newbury House.
25. Gentner, D. (1982). Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In S. Kuczaj (Ed.), Language development Language, cognition, and culture (pp.301-334). Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Goodman, J. C., Dale, P. S., & Li, P. (2008). Does frequency count? Parental input and the acquisition of vocabulary. Journal of Child Language, 35, 515-531. [DOI:10.1017/S0305000907008641]
27. Hatch, E.M. (1983). Psycholinguistics: a second language perspective. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
28. Koirala, C. (2015). The word frequency effect on second language vocabulary learning. In F. Helm, L. Bradley, M. Guarda, & S. Thouësny (Eds.), Critical CALL - Proceedings of the 2015 EUROCALL Conference, Padova, Italy (pp. 318-323). Dublin: Research- publishing.net. [DOI:10.14705/rpnet.2015.000352]
29. Krashen, S. (1981). Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
30. Labov, W., Rosenfelder, I. & Fruehwald, J. (2013). 100 years of sound change: linear incrementation, reversal, and re-analysis. Language, 89, 30-66. [DOI:10.1353/lan.2013.0015]
31. Larsen-Freeman, D. & Long, M.H. (1991). An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition Research. London: Longman.
32. Larson-Hall, J. (2008). Weighing the benefits of studying a foreign language at a younger starting age in a minimal input situation. Second Language Research, 24, 35-63. [DOI:10.1177/0267658307082981]
33. Lieven, E. (2010). Input and first language acquisition: Evaluating the role of frequency. Lingua, 120(11), 2546-2556. [DOI:10.1016/j.lingua.2010.06.005]
34. Long, M. H. (1983a). Linguistic and conversational adjustments to nonnative speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5, 177-194. [DOI:10.1017/S0272263100004848]
35. Lyster, R. (2007). Content and language integrated teaching: a counterbalanced approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
36. Mackay, A., & Gass, S. (2002). Frequency Effects and Second Language: A Complex Picture? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 249-260. [DOI:10.1017/S0272263102002097]
37. McDonough, K. (2005). Identifying the impact of negative feedback and learners' responses on ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 79-103. [DOI:10.1017/S0272263105050047]
38. McDonough, K., & Mackey, A. (2008). Syntactic priming and ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(1), 31-47. [DOI:10.1017/S0272263108080029]
39. Mintz, T. H., Newport, E. L., & Bever, T. G. (2002). The distributional structure of grammatical categories in speech to young children. Cognitive Science, 26, 393-424. [DOI:10.1207/s15516709cog2604_1]
40. Paradise, J. (2011). Individual differences in child English second language acquisition: Comparing child-internal and child-external factors. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism,1(3), 213-237. [DOI:10.1075/lab.1.3.01par]
41. Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2015). Incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition from and while reading: An eye-tracking study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(1), 1-34. [DOI:10.1017/S0272263115000224]
42. Pellicer-Sánchez, A., & Schmitt, N. (2010). Incidental vocabulary acquisition from an authentic novel: Do Things Fall Apart? Reading in a Foreign Language, 22(1), 31-55.
43. Pigada, M., & Schmitt, N. (2006). Vocabulary acquisition from extensive reading: A case study. Reading in a Foreign Language, 18, 1-28.
44. Pica, T. (1983). Adult acquisition of English as a second language under different conditions of exposure. Language Learning, 33, 465-497. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1983.tb00945.x]
45. Rahimi, M. A., Gholami, J., & Mohammadnia, Z. (2019). The impact of different frequency patterns on the syntactic production of a 6-year-old EFL home learner: a case study. Applied Research on English Language, 8(3), 311-338.
46. Scheele, A., F., Leseman, P., P. M., & Mayo, A., Y. (2010). The home language environment of monolingual and bilingual children and their language proficiency. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 117-140. [DOI:10.1017/S0142716409990191]
47. Schwartz, B. L. (1999). Sparkling at the end of the tongue: The etiology of tip-of-the-tongue phenomenology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 379-393. [DOI:10.3758/BF03210827]
48. Schwartz, R. G., & Terrell, B. Y. (1983). The role of input frequency in lexical acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 10, 57-64. [DOI:10.1017/S0305000900005134]
49. Singleton, D. (2005). The Critical Period Hypothesis: A coat of many colors. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 43, 269-285. [DOI:10.1515/iral.2005.43.4.269]
50. Skehan, P. (2001). Tasks and language performance assessment. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp.167-185). Harlow: Longman.
51. Spada, N. (2014). Instructed Second Language Acquisition Research and Its Relevance for L2 Teacher Education. Education Matters, 2 (1), 41-54.
52. Stern, H. (1983). Fundamental Concepts of Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
53. Sunama, P. (2018). The Effects of Frequency of Occurrence on L2 Lexical Acquisition from Reading. Language in India, 18 (10), 321-325.
54. Suzuki, M. (2007). Learner uptake and second language learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Colombia University, USA.
55. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative Competence: Some Roles of Comprehensible Input and Comprehensible Output in its Development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
56. Van Gelderen, A., Snellings, P., & De Glopper, K. (2004). The effect of enhanced lexical retrieval on second language writing: A classroom experiment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 175-200. [DOI:10.1017/S0142716404001092]
57. Wang, M., & Koda, K. (2005). Commonalities and differences in word identification skills among learners of English as a second language. Language Learning, 55, 71-98. [DOI:10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00290.x]
58. White, C. (2003). Language learning in distance education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511667312]
59. Wolter, B. & Gyllstad, H. (2013). Frequency of input and L2 collocational processing: A comparison of congruent and incongruent collocations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 451-482. [DOI:10.1017/S0272263113000107]
60. Wulff, S., Ellis, N. C., Römer, U., Bardovi-Harlig, K., & LeBlanc, C. J. (2009). The acquisition of tense-aspect: Converging evidence from corpora, cognition, and learner constructions. Modern Language Journal, 93, 336-369. [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00895.x]
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rahimi M A, Gholami J, Mohammadnia Z. A Young EFL Learner’s Lexical Development through Different Input and Output Frequency Patterns. IJAL. 2018; 21 (2) :195-230
URL: http://ijal.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2940-en.html


Volume 21, Issue 2 (9-2018) Back to browse issues page
Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.11 seconds with 32 queries by YEKTAWEB 4137