[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 21, Issue 1 (4-2018) ::
IJAL 2018, 21(1): 1-27 Back to browse issues page
Evaluating Recall and Reflection Journals Written by Pre-Service Teachers in EFL Practicum Courses
Katayoon Afzali
Abstract:   (3388 Views)
 In view of the fact that pre-service teachers’ critical reflection through evaluating teaching activity of their peers is an important part of practicum activity, the current study aimed to analyze the recall and reflection journals written by pre-service teachers to identify and evaluate the discoursal features of their journals. To this end, a total of 272 recall and reflection journals written by pre-service teachers were analyzed on the basis of Hiebert, Morris, Berk, and Jansen's (2007) framework for analyzing their teaching practices. The findings indicated that the discourse of recall and reflection journals written by pre-service teachers is affective and descriptive rather than critical. Pre-service teachers predominantly ignore learners in writing their reflection journals. The findings of this study pointed to the need for explicit instruction of the discoursal features of reflection in teacher education classes. Therefore, teacher educators should help pre-service teachers to develop effective reflective discourse in practicum courses.
Keywords: Practicum Course, Discoursal features, Recall and reflection journals, Teacher education
Full-Text [PDF 466 kb]   (1135 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2017/08/20 | Accepted: 2018/01/12 | Published: 2018/04/15
1. Akbari, R. (2007). Reflections on reflection: A critical appraisal of reflective practices in L2 teacher education. System, 35(2), 192-207. [DOI:10.1016/j.system.2006.12.008]
2. Bezzina, C., & Michalak, J. (2009). Preparing student teachers for teaching practicum. In A. Swennen, & M. van der Klink (Eds.), Becoming a teacher educator (pp. 163-171). Netherlands: Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4020-8874-2_12]
3. Boud, D. (2001). Using journal writing to enhance reflective practice. In L. M. English, & M. A. Gillen (Eds.), Promoting journal writing in adult education: New directions in adult and continuing education. (pp. 9–18). San Francisco: Jossey Bass. [DOI:10.1002/ace.16]
4. Bullough, R., & Gitlin A. (1994). Becoming a student of teaching Methodologies for exploring self and school context. New York, NY: Garland publications.
5. Brumfit, C. J. (1997). The teacher as educational linguist. In L. van Lier and D. Corson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education. The Hague: Kluwer. [DOI:10.1007/978-94-011-4533-6_16]
6. Chung, H. Q., & van Es, E. A. (2014). Pre-service teachers' use of tools to systematically analyze teaching and learning. Teachers and Teaching, 20(2), 113-135. [DOI:10.1080/13540602.2013.848567]
7. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teacher's College Record,103, 1013-1055. [DOI:10.1111/0161-4681.00141]
8. Gee, J. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London: Taylor &Francis.
9. Hedgcock, J. S. (2002). Towards a socioliterate approach to second language teacher. The Modern Language Journal , 86, 299-317. [DOI:10.1111/1540-4781.00151]
10. Hiebert, J., & Stigler, J. W. (2000). A proposal for improving classroom teaching: Lessons from the TIMSS video study. The Elementary School Journal, 101(1), 3-20. [DOI:10.1086/499656]
11. Hiebert, J., Morris, A. K., Berk, D., & Jansen, A. (2007). Preparing teachers to learn from teaching. Journal of teacher education, 58(1), 47-61. [DOI:10.1177/0022487106295726]
12. Hodge, S.R., R. Davis, R. Woodward, & C. Sherrill (2002). Comparison of practicum types in changing preservice teachers' attitudes and perceived competence. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 19, 155-71. [DOI:10.1123/apaq.19.2.155]
13. Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.
14. Kumaravadivelu, B. (2012). Language teacher education for a global Society: A modular model for knowing, analyzing, recognizing, doing, and seeing. New York: Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9780203832530]
15. Lawson, T., Çakmak, M., Gündüz, M., & Busher, H. (2015). Research on teaching practicum–a systematic review. European journal of teacher education, 38(3), 392-407. [DOI:10.1080/02619768.2014.994060]
16. Leung, C. (2009). Second Language Teacher Professionalism- Whose agenda? In A. Burns, & J. C. Richards (Eds.). The Cambridge Guide to Second Language Teacher Education. New York: Cambridge University Press, 48–58.
17. Liu, X., & Xu, B. (2007). Urgent issues in teaching practice. Education and Profession 5: 164-165.
18. Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. Luk, J. (2008). Assessing teaching practicum reflections: Distinguishing discourse features of the "high" and "low" grade reports. System, 36(4), 624-641. [DOI:10.1016/j.system.2008.04.001]
20. Mitchell, J. M. (1996). Developing reflective teaching: Negotiation in the practicum. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 24(1), 47-61. [DOI:10.1080/1359866960240105]
21. Munby, H., T. Russell, & Martin, A. K. (2001). Teachers' knowledge and how it develops. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook for Research on Teaching (pp.877-904). Washington DC: American Educational Research Association.
22. Philipson, R. (1992). ELT: The native speaker's burden? English Language Teaching Journal. 46(1), 12-18. [DOI:10.1093/elt/46.1.12]
23. Richards, J. C. (2008). Second language teacher education today. RELC, 39(2), 158-177. [DOI:10.1177/0033688208092182]
24. Rodgers, C. R. (2002). Seeing student learning: Teacher change and the role of reflection. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 230-253. [DOI:10.17763/haer.72.2.5631743606m15751]
25. Schuman, L. (1986). Plans and situated actions. New York, NY: Cambridge University.
26. Segall, A. (2001). Re-thinking theory and practice in the preservice teacher education classroom: Teaching to learn from learning to teach. Teaching Education, 12(2), 225-242. [DOI:10.1080/10476210120068093]
27. Singh, G., & Richards, J. C. (2006). Teaching and learning in the language teacher education course room: A critical sociocultural perspective. RELC, 37(2), 149-175. [DOI:10.1177/0033688206067426]
28. Smith, K., & Lev-Ari, L. (2005). The place of practicum in pre-service teacher education: The voice of the students. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 33(3), 289-302. [DOI:10.1080/13598660500286333]
29. Smith, K., & Snoek, M. (1996, September). Dutch and Israel student teachers' views on their future role as teachers. Paper presented to the Annual Association of Teacher Education in Europe, at Strathclyde University in Glasgow, Scotland.
30. Spillane, J. P., & Jennings, N. E. (1997). Aligned instructional policy and ambitious pedagogy: Exploring instructional reform from the classroom perspective. Teachers College Record, 98(3), 449-481.
31. Star, J. R., & Strickland, S. K. (2008). Learning to observe: Using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers' ability to notice. Journal of mathematics teacher education, 11(2), 107-125. [DOI:10.1007/s10857-007-9063-7]
32. Stenberg, K. Rajala, A., & Hilppo, J. (2016). Fostering theory-practice reflection in teaching practicums. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 44(5), 470-485. [DOI:10.1080/1359866X.2015.1136406]
33. Stürmer, K., Könings, K. D., & Seidel, T. (2013). Declarative knowledge and professional vision in teacher education: Effect of courses in teaching and learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 467-483. [DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02075.x]
34. Ten Dam, G. T., & Blom, S. (2006). Learning through participation. The potential of school-based teacher education for developing a professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(6), 647-660. [DOI:10.1016/j.tate.2006.03.003]
35. Trent, J. (2013). From learner to teacher: Practice, language, and identity in a teaching practicum. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 41 (4), 426-440. [DOI:10.1080/1359866X.2013.838621]
36. Tsui, A. (2003). Understanding expertise in teaching: Case studies of second language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139524698]
37. Valli, L. (1997). Listening to other voices: A description of teacher reflection in the United States. Peabody journal of Education, 72(1), 67-68. [DOI:10.1207/s15327930pje7201_4]
38. Velandia, R. (2008). The Role of Warming Up Activities in Adolescent Students' Involvement during the English Class, Profile,10, 9-26
39. Wang, X., & Xu, Z. (2008). Reflections on the teaching practicum. Journal of History of the Chinese Communist Party, 11(1), 8-15.
40. Yan, C., & He, C. (2010). Transforming the existing model of teaching practicum: a study of Chinese EFL student teachers' perceptions. Journal of Education for Teaching, 36(1), 57-73. [DOI:10.1080/02607470903462065]
41. Zhu, X. (2011). Student teachers' reflection during practicum: Plenty on action, few in action. Reflective Practice, 12(6), 763-775. [DOI:10.1080/14623943.2011.601097]
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:


XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Afzali K. Evaluating Recall and Reflection Journals Written by Pre-Service Teachers in EFL Practicum Courses. IJAL. 2018; 21 (1) :1-27
URL: http://ijal.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2851-en.html

Volume 21, Issue 1 (4-2018) Back to browse issues page
Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.1 seconds with 32 queries by YEKTAWEB 4137