[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 19, Issue 2 (9-2016) ::
IJAL 2016, 19(2): 87-114 Back to browse issues page
Micropolitics of School and EFL Teachers’ Professional Interests: The Case of Schools for Gifted Students in Iran
Fatemeh Chahkandi , Abbass Eslami Rasekh , Mansour Tavakoli
University of Isfahan, Isfahan
Abstract:   (853 Views)
The aim of this qualitative study is to explore the role of the micropolitics of schools for gifted students in the EFL teachers’ professional interests in the workplace. Results of interviews revealed that to establish their professional interests, teachers involved in conflict and rivalry as well as collaboration and coalition. Furthermore, teachers’ micropolitical actions were interrelated with their efficacy beliefs. Self-interests such as public recognition and high visibility were sought as they provided a positive feedback on teachers’ professional behavior and substantiated their efficacy. Material interests such as the use of the smart boards, the Internet, and extra resources were further means through which they could present their informed and efficacious character to others. Organizational interests also confirmed teachers’ efficacy since only effective teachers were recruited in schools for gifted students. Teachers’ social interests achieved through developing affinity and rapport with others, particularly the principals, were the prerequisite for the establishment of all other professional interests. The findings were discussed with reference to the importance of fostering micropolitical literacy and the effect of information on school micropolitics on teachers’ ability to develop appropriate coping strategies.
Keywords: Micropolitics, Professional interests, Teacher efficacy, Power, School structure
Full-Text [PDF 418 kb]   (345 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2016/02/2 | Accepted: 2016/08/12 | Published: 2016/09/21
1. Achinstein, B. (2006). New teacher and mentor political literacy: Reading, navigating and transforming induction contexts. Teachers and teaching, 12(2), 123-138. [DOI:10.1080/13450600500467290]
2. Ball, S. J. (2012). The micro-politics of the school: Towards a theory of school organization. New York: Routledge.
3. Bernhard, J. K., & Freire, M. (1999). What is my child learning at elementary school? Culturally contested issues between teachers and Latin American families. Canadian Ethnic Studies, 31(3), 72.
4. Blasé, J. J. (1985). The socialization of teachers: An ethnographic study of factors contributing to the rationalization of the Teacher's instructional perspective. Urban Education, 20(3), 235-256. [DOI:10.1177/004208598502000301]
5. Blasé, J. J. (1988). The everyday political perspective of teachers: Vulnerability and conservatism. Internation Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 1(2), 125-142. [DOI:10.1080/0951839880010202]
6. Blasé, J. (1991). The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
7. Blasé, J., & Blasé, J. (1997). The micropolitical orientation of facilitative school principals and its effects on teachers' sense of empowerment. Journal of Educational Administration, 35(2), 138-164. [DOI:10.1108/09578239710161777]
8. Conway, C., & Rawlings, J. (2015). Three beginning music teachers' understandings and self-perceptions of micropolitical literacy. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, (204), 27-45. [DOI:10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.204.0027]
9. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
10. Curry, M., Jaxon, K., Russell, J. L., Callahan, M. A., & Bicais, J. (2008). Examining the practice of beginning teachers' micropolitical literacy within professional inquiry communities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(3), 660-673. [DOI:10.1016/j.tate.2006.10.007]
11. Epstein, J. L. (1998). Effects on student achievement of teachers' practices of parent involvement. In S. Silvern (Ed.), Literacy through family, community, and school interaction (pp. 261-276). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
12. Erb, C. S. (2002). The emotional whirlpool of beginning teachers' work. Paper Presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Society of Studies in Education, Toronto, Canada.
13. Gao, X. (2008). Teachers' professional vulnerability and cultural tradition: A Chinese paradox. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 154-165. [DOI:10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.011]
14. Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press
15. Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
16. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
17. Gold, Y. (1996). Beginning teacher support. Attrition, mentoring, and induction. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 548–594). New York, London: Macmillan.
18. Griffith, J. (1998). The relation of school structure and social environment to parent involvement in elementary schools. The Elementary School Journal, 99(1), 53-80. [DOI:10.1086/461916]
19. Grissom, J. A., Kalogrides, D., & Loeb, S. (2015). The micropolitics of educational inequality: The case of teacher–student assignments. Peabody Journal of Education, 90(5), 601-614. [DOI:10.1080/0161956X.2015.1087768]
20. Hargreaves, A. (2000). Mixed emotions: Teachers' perceptions of their interactions with students. Teaching and teacher education, 16(8), 811-826. [DOI:10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00028-7]
21. Hargreaves, A., & Tucker, E. (1991). Teaching and guilt: Exploring the feelings of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7(5), 491-505. [DOI:10.1016/0742-051X(91)90044-P]
22. Henderson, A. T. (1988). Parents Are a School's Best Friends. Phi Delta Kappan, 70(2), 148-53.
23. Hipp, K. A., & Bredeson, P. V. (1995). Exploring connections between teacher efficacy and principals' leadership behaviors. Journal of School Leadership, 5(2), 136-50.
24. Hoyle, E. (1986). The politics of school management. London, UK: Hodder and Stoughton.
25. Johnson, D. L., & Walker, T. (1991). A follow-up evaluation of the Houston parent-child development center school performance. Journal of Early Intervention, 15(3), 226-236. [DOI:10.1177/105381519101500302]
26. Jokikokko, K., Uitto, M., Deketelaere, A., & Estola, E. (2017). A beginning teacher in emotionally intensive micropolitical situations. International Journal of Educational Research, 81, 61-70. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijer.2016.11.001]
27. Kelchtermans, G. (1993). Teachers and their career story: A biographical perspective on professional development. Research on teacher thinking: Understanding professional development, 198-220.
28. Kelchtermans, G. (1996). Teacher vulnerability: Understanding its moral and political roots. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26(3), 307-323. [DOI:10.1080/0305764960260302]
29. Kelchtermans, G., & Ballet, K. (2002). The micropolitics of teacher induction. A narrative-biographical study on teacher socialization. Teaching and teacher education, 18(1), 105-120. [DOI:10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00053-1]
30. Kelchtermans, G., & Ballet, K. (2002). Micropolitical literacy: Reconstructing a neglected dimension in teacher development. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(8), 755-767. [DOI:10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00069-7]
31. Lasky, S. (2000). The cultural and emotional politics of teacher–parent interactions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(8), 843-860. [DOI:10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00030-5]
32. Lasky, S. (2005). A sociocultural approach to understanding teacher identity, agency and professional vulnerability in a context of secondary school reform. Teaching and teacher education, 21(8), 899-916. [DOI:10.1016/j.tate.2005.06.003]
33. Lee, V. E., Dedrick, R. F., & Smith, J. B. (1991). The effect of the social organization of schools on teachers' efficacy and satisfaction. Sociology of Education, 64, 190-208. [DOI:10.2307/2112851]
34. Malen, B., & Cochran, M. V. (2008). Beyond pluralistic patterns of power: Research on the micropolitics of schools. Handbook of education politics and policy, 148-178.
35. Nias, J., Southworth, G., & Yeomans, R. (1989). Staff relationships in the primary school: A study of organizational cultures. Mansell.
36. Walker, B., & MacLure, M. (1999). Secondary school parents' evenings: A qualitative study. Norwich, UK: University of East Anglia, Centre for Applied Research in Education.
37. Zembylas, M. (2007). Emotional ecology: The intersection of emotional knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge in teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(4), 355-367. [DOI:10.1016/j.tate.2006.12.002]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

Write the security code in the box >

XML     Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Chahkandi F, Eslami Rasekh A, Tavakoli M. Micropolitics of School and EFL Teachers’ Professional Interests: The Case of Schools for Gifted Students in Iran. IJAL. 2016; 19 (2) :87-114
URL: http://ijal.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2729-en.html

Volume 19, Issue 2 (9-2016) Back to browse issues page
Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.15 seconds with 31 queries by YEKTAWEB 3705